a
website exposing corrupt police serving in Hampshire Constabulary
PS Sam Dunlop and PC Matt Dunlop
proven liars, law manipulators, law evaders, paid for by you!
The Dunlop’s lie to generate a prosecution, they then lie before,
during and after the resultant court case!
Overview of false accusations made against my family and I by TI
Sam Dunlop, PC Matt Dunlop and others.
On 17th March 2008 a horse owned by Sandra Priestman and Rory
Ballard, tenants of Matt and Sam Dunlop, broke through their field
fencing, through our garden fencing, went into our stables in our
garden then kicked our horse to death.
Their horse was a rig (a rig is a half entire stallion horse,
known to be dangerous as they are neither entire nor castrated). The
owner, Sandra Priestman knew the horse was a rig and admitted as
such to Susan Butler a few days previously to the horse attack
incident.
We contacted Matt and Sam Dunlop via the Hampshire Constabulary
switchboard, they reached Sam Dunlop, she did nothing. We then
contacted the Police. The vet and eventually the carcass removal
company as our horse died within half an hour of the attack.
The Dunlop’s as landlords and Sandra Priestman and Rory Ballard
as tenants were responsible for keeping this dangerous animal
contained within their land. Matt Dunlop denied this in court and it
was subsequently explained to him in court that he was wrong (it was
not our responsibility to keep the rig out but his responsibility as
the landlord to keep the attacking animal in. The Dunlop’s and
Sandra Priestman did not have a rental agreement explaining who was
responsible for what. They consequently blame each other).
The following day, on 18th March, I was arrested by PC Elly Hurd
and five other officers for attacking a horse, attacking a person
and criminal damage!
This is amazing as I have been with my family or other officials
throughout and can account for my time as can others. We
subsequently find out that Matt and Sam Dunlop have concocted a
series of lies to attempt to create their own innocence by reneging
responsibility for them being also responsible for the death of our
horse.
I observed Sam Dunlop meeting with Rory Ballard the partner of
Sandra Priestman in the field (the Dunlops field) at the back of our
house. They spoke for twenty minutes before multiple Police in
marked cars arrive at the field gate. We subsequently discover (in
court) that Sam Dunlop has spoken with Rory Ballard, who then
accuses me, Stan Evans of the above mentioned crimes to my arresting
officer PC Elly Hurd.
Sam Dunlop (at that time herself a Sergeant in Hampshire
Constabulary) had actioned a kangaroo court to defend herself and
shift the blame on to me by blatant lies. I believe she was also
motivated by personal issues which are still unknown to us.
It takes two days in court for one of the attending officers (some
of which are friends or known to the Dunlop’s) a PC Anna Wield to
reveal to the magistrate that it was Sam Dunlop who named Stan
Evans. For clarity, she, TI Sam Dunlop, lies in a prosecution
witness statement under a signed statement of truth (which states
that the person signing is open to prosecution if there is anything
they know to be untrue is stated – its one of the basics of English
law and perjury, yet she blatantly or provably lies!).
The arrest, technically! is carried out correctly as Rory Ballard
appears (via his prosecution witness statement – where he obviously
also lies, but he is a tenant now working with landlords to avoid
his own prosecution) to make the accusation.
Again for clarity. This arrest is made with no evidence! This
arrest is made based on accusations only. I subsequently spend 15
hours in a cell in Waterlooville police station waiting questioning.
We also find this interesting! Maybe the Police can’t find evidence
to backup Rory Ballard, Sam Dunlop and Matt Dunlop’s prosecution
witness statements – because there isn’t any!
Sam Dunlop (then a sergeant) and Matt Dunlop (a PC) made
condemning prosecution witness statements – and weren’t even at the
scene of the accusations they made, yet the local Police arrested
me, because they knew the Dunlop’s as serving colleagues and took
their words as automatically being the truth!
My son and partner obviously objected in the strongest way as I
was arrested outside my house by five Police officers with Matt
Dunlop (claimed in court to be off duty - but he was in full Police
uniform!), my son, Harley, was arrested at the scene (he also spent
15 hours in a police cell) and Susan Butler, my partner was
summonsed weeks later (also for protesting my innocence to the
Police at the time of my arrest).
Charges against my son were dropped within weeks.
The CPS (obviously influenced by prosecution witness statements
made by serving police officers, Sam and Matt Dunlop) decide to
proceed to prosecute me, Stan Evans, and my partner, Susan Butler.
I went to court for three pre-court meetings where I was given
the opportunity to admit guilt, which I obviously didn’t as I
wasn’t, and looked forward to my days in court.
(As an interesting aside – I was advised by my solicitor at the
time to plead guilty and take a bindover! He was duly 'fired' and
replaced by two barristers. I wonder how many innocent people take a
caution to avoid the stress of court and avoid the financial penalty
of going to court?)
We (Stan Evans and Susan Butler) went to court on 5th and 6th
January 2009, accused of section 4 and section 5 public order
offence charges, in plain English, attacking a person, attacking a
horse and criminal damage.
In court Sam Dunlop, Matt Dunlop, Rory Ballard and his father
Rory Ballard senior (the Ballard’s attended the field soon after the
horse attack incident and repeated lies fed to them by the Dunlop’s)
were torn to pieces as their lies were exposed. PC Elly Hurd and PC
Anna Wield, officers making the arrest were also cross examined. Our
barristers discover on the second day in court that PC Elly Hurd had
with-held information (all prosecution information must be exposed
to the defence legal team before attending court – it was not). PC
Hurd was told by the magistrates to go over the road to Fareham
Police station to get the removed information. When this information
was returned our barristers discover PC Matt Dunlop had been
progressing the case privately in Police time, using Police
equipment using his Police email, he even met with another officer,
PC Ann Stevens, in Bishops Waltham Police Station car park (he also
admits using ebay on the Police computer, this amused us but didn't
amuse the barristers who asked if this was allowed). We also
discover that his claims on the first day in court (that he did not
tell anyone) were lies in court. He was recalled to the witness dock
and under questioning by my barrister (with our new evidence at
hand) he admits that yes he did indeed inform and discuss the case
with several Police colleagues and several neighbours in our
village. {this is one of the reasons for this website – this is our
say!}
After two days in court, one witness, Clair Enfield, was
effectively thrown out of court by the CPS solicitor as her
statement was unbelievable and she lost her temper under cross
examining. The three magistrates either drop charges before
sentencing or at sentencing then declare my partner, Susan Butler,
and me, Stan Evans, not guilty of all accusations. Discrepancies in
Police evidence were quoted.
I had requested at previous meetings with the Professional
Standards Department that the PSD should attend the court meetings
due to my claims (at meetings with Police at my request - my claims
as set out here) concerning these two serving Police officers. The
PSD did not attend court on either day! They failed to effectively
police the Police. We consequently spend three days with them, at my
request to re-open investigation of the Dunlop’s, after we were
cleared. This would not have been necessary had the PSD attended
court and seen for themselves what both of the Dunlop’s plus other
serving officers had to say!
In summary, two police neighbours who were responsible for a
crime tried to cover their guilt by making counter claims of totally
untrue crimes against me and my family. They manipulated the Crown
Prosecution Service by concocted a story to cover their own guilt
and lied extensively under a signed statement of truth in
prosecution witness statements.
They manipulated the local Police as they knew at least one of
them, or even (as was later revealed) bullied and harassed my
arresting officer. (Sam Dunlop, a sergeant at that time, continually
contacted PC Elley Hurd who eventually had to go to her superior,
Inspector Peglar, to prevent this). Sam Dunlop and Matt Dunlop
created totally fabricated prosecution witness statements which were
designed to 1)gain an arrest by the local Police, then 2)influence
the Crown Prosecution Service to make charges. This they
successfully did, but their lies were revealed in court.
In this section of the website I am including a breakdown of each
prosecution witness and you’ll also be able to download the original
documents. *** To be published here soon
We have met continuously with the Professional Standards
Department and the Independent Police Complaints Commission over the
last two years – but still the officers mentioned (Training
Inspector Sam Dunlop and PC Matt Dunlop) are serving officers!
(we met the PSD previous to the court meeting as we obviously
knew the charges against us were untrue, but subsequent
investigation of the Dunlop’s and others was held back until after
our court case due to sub-justice laws – i.e. two cases cannot run
at the same time)
***
Sam Dunlop, within six weeks of our court case and not guilty
verdict, made further accusations that I had an altercation with our
postman. The PSD immediately investigated this and Sam Dunlop was
given ‘operational advice’ concerning the inaccuracy of her
reporting! (Sam Dunlop told lies!) she also received operational
advice given for being ‘overzealous’ regarding her communication
with my arresting officer, PC Hurd (Sam Dunlop attempted to bully a
colleague of lower rank!)
It’s very simple – we are dealing with two neighbours, serving
officers within the Hampshire Constabulary, who have lied before,
during, and after a court case involving serious accusations which
they themselves concocted!
The authorities have shown (by issuing operational advice) that
they are aware of the Dunlop’s behaviour and actions, but take no
action against them other than advice. They are still in ‘positions
of power employed by Hampshire Constabulary’ to potentially do
similar things. I warned the PSD, after court, they would not stop
and would make further false allegations, they dismissed this as
conjecture and presumption. They (the Dunlop’s) subsequently did
this by accusing me of having altercations with our postman and also
of stealing their CCTV camera (both issues investigated and
dismissed – still the authorities do nothing!). The PSD were wrong –
I was proven correct.
I therefore now openly publish 1) in the name of justice, 2) because Alex Marshall, chief constable of Hampshire, is strangely unwilling to investigate the facts behind my arrest and remove me from the criminal database, and 3) because PC Matt Dunlop 'made it his business' to quote from court, to inform our neighbours and his colleagues of his version of events. (if his sycophantic friends haven’t worked it out by now – he and his wife wouldn’t even know how to spell the word ‘truth’)
All our court and travel costs were returned to us due to our
'not guilty' verdicts. But this case has cost the Hampshire taxpayer
a fortune!